![Jeffrey Ornstein](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 230
- 425 602
Jeffrey Ornstein
United States
Приєднався 27 бер 2012
Welcome! I cover subjects such as trains, buses, watches, cameras, calculators and anything else I may come across that I need to say something about, review or even criticize. Especially popular is my Lauren Pazienza series. I hope you find these videos of interest as well! Please subscribe!!
Brisbane's Superbus: The Leyland Panther with American Flair [Australian Bus History]
In the late 1960's, Brisbane's transport system was looking to develop and purchase a new "Bus of the Future" that will eventually replace all of the city's trams and trolleybuses.
This came in the form of 340 Leyland Panthers (and one prototype) that modernized the bus system of Brisbane by 1970.
This bus incorporated many new features and "creature comforts" for passengers that did not exist in previous buses.
Built on a Leyland Leopard chassis, with an Australian-built body and what looks to be styling very similar to an American New Look bus, it was a combination of many different elements from the best buses of its time.
See and hear the story of the Brisbane Panthers - the "Bus of the Future!"
#buses #transportationhistory #australia
This came in the form of 340 Leyland Panthers (and one prototype) that modernized the bus system of Brisbane by 1970.
This bus incorporated many new features and "creature comforts" for passengers that did not exist in previous buses.
Built on a Leyland Leopard chassis, with an Australian-built body and what looks to be styling very similar to an American New Look bus, it was a combination of many different elements from the best buses of its time.
See and hear the story of the Brisbane Panthers - the "Bus of the Future!"
#buses #transportationhistory #australia
Переглядів: 435
Відео
AEC Bridgemaster Bus: Too Little, Too Late? [UK Bus History]
Переглядів 11 тис.День тому
Throughout the 1950's the best selling low-height or low-brige bus in the UK was the Bristol Lokekka. But the Lodekka was only available to the state-owned Tilling group of bus companies. If you were part of the British Electric Traction Group, or were an independent, or a municipal, you could not buy the Lodekka. Therefore, in 1956, AEC, in association with body builder ACV (Crossley) and then...
Manchester Mancunian: Most Beautiful Double Decker Bus, Ever? [UK Bus History]
Переглядів 6 тис.День тому
In 1968, a new type of double decker bus appeared on the streets of Manchester, England. It was called the Manchester Mancunian. Delivered to Manchester City Transport, and the creation of Manager Ralph Bennett and in-house designer Ken Mortimer, it represented a new type of styling that was considered an improvement over other buses of the time. With it's pleasing proportions and deep front wi...
The Guy Wulfrunian Story: The Edsel of British Buses? [UK Bus History]
Переглядів 29 тис.2 дні тому
In the late 1950's an entirely new British bus appeared that was different than anything that came before it. Sporting air suspension and disc brakes, as well as a front entrance - with the engine up front, it was quite revolutionary for its time. Deisgned by Ronald Brooke, Fleet Engineer of the West Riding Bus Company, at that time the UK's largest independent bus operator, and built by Guy Mo...
The Leyland National Bus: Amazingly Flawed Engineering!
Переглядів 34 тис.14 днів тому
In 1970, a new type of transport bus was introduced to the press in the UK called the Leyland National. It was to be something different than the typical British Bus. In 1972, the first production units rolled off the assembly line at a new factory Lillyhall, near Workington. It was specifically built only to mass-produce the Leyland National. The National was a bus that introduced modular cons...
The Chicago Streetcar That Gave Birth to 20,000 PCC Trolleys and Rapid Transit Cars!
Переглядів 4,6 тис.14 днів тому
In 1934, the Chicago Surface Lines contracted with J.G. Brill and Pullman-Standard to design and built two revolutionary new streetcars that would be unlike anything that has been seen before. In conjunction with the Electric Railway President's Conference Committee, the two Chicago cars would be similar to the two cars being built by the committee, but would only run in Chicago. Two cars were ...
USA's Obscure 500-mph Aerotrain Inspired by 2001: A Space Odyssey!
Переглядів 1,6 тис.21 день тому
Video was made for educational purposes to make more people aware of the great ROHR Aerotrain! In the early 1970's, the US Department of Transportation (DOT) began an inititative to develop high-speed ground transportation to solve various energy and traffic problems. In other words, a high-speed train. DOT awarded contracts to three aerospace companies to build prototypes of new high-speed tec...
Mack Trucks' Mysterious New Haven Railbus: A Transit Enigma!
Переглядів 13 тис.21 день тому
In late 1949, a radical and unusual new type of transit vehicle was ordered by the New Haven Railroad from Mack Trucks. It was called the FCD - named after the president of the New Haven. The FCD was quite odd on many fronts: It was for use on mainline railroads. It was built from the body of a Mack C-50 transit bus. And it utilized the B-3 trucks that were manufactured for the PCC streetcars. ...
New York's Ultimate Double Decker Bus: The 1936 "Queen Mary"
Переглядів 778Місяць тому
In 1936, a radical new type of double decker bus appeared on the streets of New York and Chicago. It was the type 720/735, built by Yellow Coach. It was purchased by the Fifth Avenue Coach Company and the Chicago Motor Coach Company. Both bus companies were under the ownership of the Omnibus Corporation. A revised version of the fabulous type 706 bus (of which only one was built for Chicago), t...
Curbside Classic's Nasty, Dishonest Copyright Strike! [Bus Stop Classics Videos]
Переглядів 461Місяць тому
Hello Everyone, Just wanted to give an update to my channel. As some of you know, I was utilizing some material from articles on unusual buses from Curbside Classic dot com. After the first video where I quoted from one of their articles (the Dyson Landliner), I received a positive comment from the author of the article, Jim , stating I can reference/utilize his articles for my bus episodes. Ok...
Amtrak's French RTG Turboliner: Impressive But Disappointing!
Переглядів 3,7 тис.2 місяці тому
After the failed TurboTrain experiment of 1968 to the early 1970s, Amtrak decided to try again - this time with a new French-built Turboliner, called the RTG. While there was much fanfare and enthusiasm about the RTG, it unfortunately did not live up to its expectations. In this video, we review an article from the New York Times that describes the Turboliner on its first runs in the US. Being ...
TurboTrain: One of the Biggest Scams of American Railroading!
Переглядів 10 тис.2 місяці тому
Correction: At the outro of the video, I stated that Amtrak did not buy any of the French RTG turbos. Actually, they did - first they leased units, and then purchased six (6) sets for a total of $18 million. In 1968, a new train appeared that was going transform American passenger trains. Or so it was planned. The United Aircraft TurboTrain, a new concept in high-speed rail, made its debut as a...
Cuba's Hershey Electric Railway: Slow, Dilapidated, But Fun!
Переглядів 2,5 тис.2 місяці тому
Cuba's Hershey Electric Railway: Slow, Dilapidated, But Fun!
India's Double Decker Trailer Buses: The 100-Passenger Behemoth!
Переглядів 1,8 тис.2 місяці тому
In this video, we look at something unique - the double decker trailer buses of India. A number of cities had them - Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, Chennai as well as the North Bengal State Transportation Company. These buses were designed to hold 100 passengers - but probably carried much more. While there was not much technical information that could be obtained about these buses, the photos really ...
Italy's Futuristic Sci-Fi Concept Bus!
Переглядів 1,1 тис.2 місяці тому
In 1956, Viberti of Tourino, Italy, constructed an unusual one-of-a-kind bus: The Golden Dolphin. The bus was akin to sci-fi spaceships of the movies of that time. It was mainly constructed out of plastic, and was powered by a gas turbine engine. It was luxuriously appointed and supposedly included a kitchen. The bus was shaped like a dolphin and was painted a shiny gold color, hence the name '...
Trolleybuses of Valparaiso, Chile: Pullmans are National Monuments!
Переглядів 1,3 тис.2 місяці тому
Trolleybuses of Valparaiso, Chile: Pullmans are National Monuments!
Leyland Experimental Vehicle Railbus in USA: UNFIT AND UNWANTED!
Переглядів 7 тис.2 місяці тому
Leyland Experimental Vehicle Railbus in USA: UNFIT AND UNWANTED!
Havana's Camel Buses: Because Cuba Couldn't Build a Subway - TWICE!
Переглядів 10 тис.2 місяці тому
Havana's Camel Buses: Because Cuba Couldn't Build a Subway - TWICE!
USA vs. UK: THE CUBAN BUS CRISIS OF 1964! [History of Buses]
Переглядів 7 тис.3 місяці тому
USA vs. UK: THE CUBAN BUS CRISIS OF 1964! [History of Buses]
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: NYCT German Demo Buses of 1974 & 2008
Переглядів 2,1 тис.3 місяці тому
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: NYCT German Demo Buses of 1974 & 2008
Grumman vs. NYC Potholes: The Fight to Fix the Flxible 870 Bus [History of Buses]
Переглядів 3,3 тис.3 місяці тому
Grumman vs. NYC Potholes: The Fight to Fix the Flxible 870 Bus [History of Buses]
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1982 Test of Romanian Rocar DAC Articulated Bus [History of Buses]
Переглядів 2,9 тис.3 місяці тому
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1982 Test of Romanian Rocar DAC Articulated Bus [History of Buses]
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1981 NYC Test of Japanese Hino RC Bus [History of Buses]
Переглядів 4,5 тис.3 місяці тому
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1981 NYC Test of Japanese Hino RC Bus [History of Buses]
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1981 NYC Test of French Renault PR100 Bus [History of Buses]
Переглядів 2,9 тис.3 місяці тому
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: 1981 NYC Test of French Renault PR100 Bus [History of Buses]
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: NYC British Leyland Double Deckers of 1976 [History of Buses]
Переглядів 5 тис.3 місяці тому
MTA GLOBAL BUS SEARCH: NYC British Leyland Double Deckers of 1976 [History of Buses]
JUNK THESE BUSES NOW! New York's Grumman Bus Crisis of 1984 [History of Buses]
Переглядів 50 тис.3 місяці тому
JUNK THESE BUSES NOW! New York's Grumman Bus Crisis of 1984 [History of Buses]
Budd: The Dismal End of America's Last Passenger Train Builder [Railroad History]
Переглядів 14 тис.3 місяці тому
Budd: The Dismal End of America's Last Passenger Train Builder [Railroad History]
Why the Aerospace Industry Abandoned Mass Transit [Early BART Challenges]
Переглядів 4,4 тис.3 місяці тому
Why the Aerospace Industry Abandoned Mass Transit [Early BART Challenges]
SOAC: America's Luxury Subway Train of the Future [Documentary]
Переглядів 2,1 тис.3 місяці тому
SOAC: America's Luxury Subway Train of the Future [Documentary]
California Steam Bus: 3 Boiler-Powered GM & FlxibleTransit Buses!
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 місяці тому
California Steam Bus: 3 Boiler-Powered GM & FlxibleTransit Buses!
Hiya sir can remember western Scottish running a few in Jaffa cake livery from January 1991 thru 1994 predominantly oan lochside and locharbriggs routes in Dumfries Scotland very interesting wee channel sir ,I myself used to scrap buses circa 2002 predominantly ex McEwan's of Dumfries Duple bodied Leyland leopard and the odd ex western Scottish (unfortunately by then part o the evil stagecoach empire) Alexander bodied Leyland leopards McEwan's ones were death traps while ex western Scottish ones were like new Alexander bodied ones were far better quality than Duple rubbish oh well thanx sir and greetings from Dumfries Scotland
It's Wul-FROO-ni-an
ok.
Great video…..Thankyou 👍🇮🇲
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for watching!!!
I caught a ride in one that had passed to a small Sydney private operator back in the mid 1990s and was amazed how spacious and comfortable a 1968 bus could feel. It felt very solid and free of rattles and felt better than many much newer buses. That ZF Busmatic and Leyland lump was a fantastic sound combination. Beautiful coverage of the Brissy Panther story.
Thanks for your memory of the Panther! Glad you liked the video! Thanks for watching!
The council really took a gamble with replacing an entire trolly system with the bus system based on American advisors, and it all worked out, Really enjoy these videos, thumbs up,
Glad you liked the video!! And thank you so much for watching!
Hi Jeffrey, I wonder if the west nederlands Nationals took the window screen( to reduce window reflections) design from the Panthers. Well researched video thank you.
Hi! Yes, I know the front window screens are similar to the Nationals in the Netherlands! This was already in use on the "New Look" buses in the US since 1959 - so that may have been where the design came from. Thank you for watching!!
@@JeffreyOrnstein Is often referred to as a lantern windscreen. They seemed to be in vogue during the 1960s. Adelaide's AEC Swifts, Daimler Roadliners (which had Cummins engines) and Volvo B59s all with the same style bodywork, featured them.
The first 40 with pneumocyclic transmissions were a dream. So nice to drive. The 2 speed ZFs were slow, but durable. The front platform arrangement was brilliant. On the flip side of their lives, the aluminium in the Brisbane Leopards and Panthers made them particularly valuable when they were sent to scrap.
Thanks for your memory of the Leopards and Panthers! Thank you for watching!!
Informative video, thank you. It was a brave order by Brisbane, to acquire so many of what was, then, a relatively new and untried bus. I understand the chassis frame was shared with its AEC counterpart, the Swift. Both suffered (allegedly) from flexing, which caused problems later in life with the bodywork on some examples. Maybe the adoption of a design with thicker window pillars than contemporary UK designs mitigated against this. Whatever, they seemed to perform well enough "down under"
Thanks for the additional info on the chassis! And thank you for watching!
I think the Portsmouth and King Alfred of Winchester Panthers were the most attractive versions of the Panther in the UK but I will have to "pass" on the looks of these Brisbane Panthers but they may be "an acquired taste".
Yes, and I myself like the Merseyside Panthers - a picture of which I had in the video. Thanks for watching!
Great video! But your pronounciation of Brisbane is a bit off, the 'bane' part should be pronounced more like 'bin'. Also, if you're interested, you should check out John Dunn's history of Commonwealth Engineering series. Vol. 2 go over these buses a little bit, but what you'd find more interesting would be Comeng's involvement with the Budd company. Both of them worked together alot, and Vol. 5 goes in depth on the Comeng designed C1/C3 cars for the LIRR in NYC. Vol. 3 also talks a lot about the 1950s era of Budd and how they adapted Budd's stainless steel for use in trains in Australia. I've read all 5 volumes and I use them frequently for making my own videos. They're a fascinating read.
Hello! Sorry about the wrong pronunciation, LOL! Great info - those books sound interesting - would make a nice addition to my collection! Thank you for watching!
14:56 Greater Manchester Transport copied the San Francisco MUNI "M". I wonder if they still use it?
Hello! I don't think Manchester uses it anymore. Looks like it's been replaced with the Bee Line buses. But I could be wrong... Thank you for watching!!
Nice to see a video on my every day ride, back when I was a school kid. In fact quite something to see the Bus Route - 3A I rode on actually pictured.
Glad you liked the video! Thanks for watching!
Peter Wyngard had a pretty extraordinary life. He actually grew up in a Japanese concentration camp during the war, which was more than what Jason King could claim...
Wow, didn't know that about Wyngard. Thanks for watching!
Addendum,one of my first public bu photos was of,one of the Mancunians on 5th Avenue! Never did get to ride on one! Ah,the 1970's,a most interesting time! Thank you! 😇 ! 😊
Jeff,a suggestion! Liverpool Green Goddesses,DD Trams! A very modern design of the 1940's[?],later went to Glasgow,Scotland! Very interesting! Thank you 😇 😊!
Hello! I will look into those trams - I know there were two types of those trams in Liverpool - one had two axles and the other had two trucks with four axles. Thank you for watching!!
I remember Ribble Motor Services, one of the largest independent bus operators outside ofLondon and part of the BET group, used to have high bridge and low bridge versions of the Atlantean. Inside of the upper saloon above the front windows, it would say 13' 6" on the low bridge and 14' 6" on the high bridge. Not sure if this was to reassure the front seat upper saloon passengers though! I think they had some high and low bridge Leyland Titans before the Atlanteans as well.
Interesting info about the heights of the buses! Thanks for watching!
I grew up with these. By far my favourite model
Thanks for watching!
Very nice but Alexander an68 More appealing Alexander an 68 Tyne and wear pre please
Ok, will look into it! Thanks for watching!
Be sure to skip to 5:20 bro is respectfully yapping
As an extreme oblong box, the vehicle really is attractive.
Yes it is!! Thanks for watching!
Well Done Jeff Why Were Did All The American Buses Have Their Front And Rear Axles Further Apart From European Making Then Harder To Turn Corners And Why Use Fuel Drinking Screaming Jimmy's LOL
Hello! American buses are generally longer and (and wider) than British buses, normally at 40 ft. long. So it will have a longer wheelbase. Also, there's not the need to make tight turns very often, as the streets in US cities are often quite wide. And they replaced trolleys that were often 45 ft. long! Thanks for watching!
Given that the all-up weight of a British 1950's era double decker bus was around 27,000 to 33,000 pounds, so somewhere around 15,000 to 18,000 pounds on the front axle, removing the upper front sets to remove 8 passengers (about 1,200 pounds) is not going to make any noticeable difference to handling or wear on front end components. It must have been some non-technical manager's bright idea.
Jeffrey said the bus had a Cave-Brown-Cave cooling system. I have heard of a Cave-Brown-Cave cabin heating and ventilation system, but what the heck is a Cave-Brown-Cave cooling system? Did you make a mistake, Jeffrey? Jeffrey said it had no radiator. Given the engine was a standard Gardner water cooled engine, not air cooled, how can this be?
Hello...I did not make a mistake about the Cave-Brown-Cave Cooling system. I took the wording exactly as it was from the Marketing material I found for the bus. For the radiator-less system, I also used the wording/terminology exactly from what I found. I will have to look for the info I had on that if you really want to know more.
@@JeffreyOrnstein I think it would be very worthwhile to look into it and if your description is accurate, worth making another video on those innovations. In a quick bit of googling I couldn't find anything on the engine cooling system, apart from a single sentence in 2 museum websites. The Wikipedia article says nothing about it. Photos show no visible radiator at the front, like contemporary front engine busses, but that doesn't mean there wasn't a radiator somewhere else. Perhaps it was mounted under chassis with an electric fan drawing air upwards. This would allow reduction of length forward of the front wheels without compromising passenger space. You have a cutaway diagram at 0:17 but we can't read the key notes. I did find out that some Wulfrunians did have the usual radiator at the front. However most just have louvers at the bottom to ensure fumes did not build up in the engine compartment, and louvers at the top for cabin ventilation. All rolling chassis supplied by the Guy factory to the coach-builders actually did have the usual radiator at the front, but it was evidently typically removed or shifted by a coach-builder. If you do make a video describing the engine cooling, please post a note here and I'll get a notification. I'll be sure to watch it. The 6LX engine would shed about 100 kW of heat in its coolant - about 50 domestic room heaters - all that heat has to go somewhere. Jeffrey, you may not have made a mistake - perhaps you quoted accurately from www.historywebsite.co.uk/Museum/Transport/Buses/Guy/Wulfrunian.htm but they made the mistake, in their single sentence about it? Perhaps the marketing meant to say the radiator was not at the front, not that there was no radiator?
Going on what Jeffrey has said about this bus, it is not an Edsel of busses. Jeffrey has said that the bus failed due to design deficiencies causing excessive wear of certain parts and poor handling. The Edsel car design was quite sound and did not have any vices, but was a marketing failure because people didn't like the styling - they didn't like the big vagina-looking thing on the front. There appears nothing wrong with the bus styling. And the Edsel name was not inspiring like Ford's other model names eg Falcon, Customline, etc. The bus is more like a Triumph Herald car, which had handling vices and for which there developed a market for upgrade kits to replace front end parts intended to never need greasing, but lasted only a year. One used to see that occasional Herald with no back window, as they went translucent so you couldn't see what was behind. Heralds had a paper-mache dash too, which didn't last long.
Hello....Edsel, as I used the term, is mainly due to it being synonymous with the word "failure." This is probably more of an American expression than it is anywhere else. Anything that doesn't work as advertised is often called an Edsel of ____(fill in the blank). It may not be used as much today, as the current younger generation probably does not know what an Edsel is. As to the Edsel being a sound car...well, that is up for debate as it did have many problems mechanically and finish-wise. And finally, as for the name....who would really buy a bus named Wulfrunian? I don't think it helped it any when trying to market the vehicle. Thanks for watching.
@@JeffreyOrnstein You need to read up on the Edsel. It was clearly a marketing failure. mainly due to its styling, not a problem with faults. This is proved by its failure to sell right from its introduction, well before it could acquire any reputation for faults. In its first year only 63,000 were sold, which is very low for a Big Three US car at that time. It was supposed to compete with GM's oldsmobile, which sold about 200,000 per year. Because Ford tried to contain costs, it began to cut corners in production, leading to poor quality control, which did impact on sales by the last year of production. But the design and engineering was sound. This is quite different to the issues with the Wulfrunin, which as you described then were engineering design flaws. The Edsel failed to sell because it was considered ugly. Because the name did not inspire potential buyers. I should think it wouldn't matter what a bus manufacturer calls its busses - bus companies are not fickle retail buyers and buy on objective factors like fuel consumption, maintenance costs, etc. Ford made big mistakes in advertising the Edsel too. For instance, they emphasized its differences to other cars - customers didn't like the differences. Ford heavily promoted safety features new with the Edsel - perversely this turned potential buyers off. If you check, you'll find the term "Edsel" came to mean a thing that won't sell because it is the wrong product for the market, and does not mean a defective product. You should note that the Edsel actually sold about 100,000 in 2 full years of production- actually a big number of cars. But Ford abandoned it because they needed to sell about twice that number to break even - they lost $400 million on the car. some competing brand/models sold about the same numbers but are not considered failures because they were not expected to sell more. A similar problem with bad marketing happened with the Leyland P76. Right from the start, people wouldn't buy it because they thought it ugly, and not like its competitors. Mechanically a P76 is a Rover, considered a good car. The P76 is Leyland's Edsel.
The really damning feature of the Bridgemaster was the integral construction. Apart from London, nobody at that period was interested in a vehicle which did not allow the operator to specify their own body manufacturer. This was particularly the case when there was still a substantial number of coachbuilders to choose from, and municipal operators particularly often had a favoured (often local) supplier prepared to customise bodies to suit their particular requirements. There had been several previous attempts to sell integral vehicles by Beadle, Sentinel, Leyland (with the Olympic) and others, all ending in tears. London had some integral AEC trolleybuses prewar, but even the Routemaster found only a single customer outside London in the shape of Northern General.
Oh, yes, the integral build was a bad idea! Thanks for the great clarification! And thanks for watching!
Its a shame AEC never developed a Rearmaster (like the one off FRM but with a chassis. However the Leyland takeover killed that off, and they refused to produce the FRM in quantity offering the AV691 engine in the Bristol VRT.There were no takers . Between 1970-74 British Leyland were rhe only double deck builders with the Leyland Atlantean, Daimler/Leyland Fleetline and Bristol VR Grim days!
Interesting scenario - a Bridgemaster in the form of a Routemaster FRM! Thanks for watching!
My dad drove one for years
Awesome! Thanks for watching!
I remember riding these buses in suburban Chicago….when the Grummans were pulled from service they were replaced by school buses and older buses from the Chicago Transit Authority
Wow, replaced by school buses? I'd much rather ride a Grumman! Thanks for watching!
The materials are a mystery. That would make it or break it.
LOL. Thanks for watching!
Good onya Jeffrey love ya videos, I've lived in Australia for 43 years but originally from UK, Great work mate and very interesting! Can I put in a Suggestion? I'm originally from Reading (pronounced Redding) in Berkshire, we had trolley buses up to 1968, I was a 16 year old kid with my camera on the farewell day in August 1968, May I suggest a future vid by you on the Trolly Buses of Reading? Not just me but I'd say quite a few people would just Love it! Many thanks Jeffrey not bad for a Yank! 😂 Cheers Mate!
Hello! I'm really happy you found my videos and that you really like my work! I will look into the Reading trolleybuses. If there's enough information out there, especially if it has an interesting or unusual aspect to its story, I'll consider it. My next video will be an Australian subject, so hopefully you'll stay tuned for that one! Thanks so much for watching from Australia!
I remember them well, didn’t like the way that they rattled and shacked , as the engine ticked over or over any road that wasn’t perfectly smooth .
Hello! Thank you for your memories of the Leyland National! Thanks for watching!
Went to school many times on 310 MFC [5.21] when new with City of Oxford in the 1960s..was allocated to Wantage Depot. Thanks for posting🙂
Hello! Thanks for your recollection of the City of Oxford Bridgemaster. Great color scheme! Thanks for watching!
Belgrade, Yugoslavia, use to have Leyland buses. They were known as having misterious semi-automatic transmission with no clutch. They also were had to kept running in the winter over night, as if engine drops to low temperature, it would not start.
Hello! Wow, that's really interesting to hear about the Leylands in Belgrade! Thanks for watching!
the distinctive Dark Blue and Red Livery on Accrington Corporation Buses (11:55) was a tribute after World War One as it was the Regimental colours of the 'Accrington Pals' Battallion who were practically wiped out on the first day of the battle of the Somme July 1st 1916. a sad loss to the town of Accrington, East Lancahire. i remember the colours so well as a kid in 1960's.
Hello! Thanks for the information on the color scheme of the Accrington buses! If I had known that, I would probably have mentioned in the video. Incredible story. Thanks for watching!
Honestly its not a scam if it was amtraks decision to run it, it was sort of an unproven concept that really didnt get to improve, The Canadian sets faired better. I think some of the bigger issues that made the UAC not a big thing. were the modular truck design & the turbines being expensive af. The UAC was a rushed concept that should've had more time to develop, the PDCs were litterally bigger than they needed to be due to a swap from Diesel to turbine power mid development! But with the speeds it was capable of, and being able to enter NYP, i think the UAC could've been a good thing for American high speed rail but due to the Ground speed act the DOT wanted a fast train fast, and lead to the UAC as we knew it.
Hello! Thank you for the additional information on the TurboTrain!! Thanks for watching!
@@JeffreyOrnstein thank you for the video, and your very welcome!
Very interesting video Jeffery. I'm sure they used Guy buses on East Lincolnshire services also. Thank you so much.
Hello! I'm really glad you liked the video! Thanks for watching!
One of the worst watch review I read.
Ok
When I was a kid, my mate's dad had a Guy bus, took it to rallys all over the place. It was a single deck "Guy Special." Great fun. Messing with it. Happy memories.
Thanks for your memories of your friend's dad's Guy bus! Thank you for watching!
We still rode a Leyland national to school and back from 2008-2013 when the Leyland Olympics were off the road
Thank you for your memories of the Leyland National! Thank you for watching!
No thank you Jeffrey, your content is GREAT!
Hello! Thank you so much for watching! I am very happy you liked my video!
Thanks! Greetings from Wales. It did look a lot like the Daimler Fleetline, which is my favourite bus. Would love to see you review one of those.
I'll look into the Fleetlines!! Thanks for watching!
Jesus I thought it was a bot voice-over at first....
LOL, why would anyone think that???
I remember them well. Yes, they were basic inside….easier for cleaning I assume.
Interesting to hear that! Thanks for watching!
We had these in Canberra, Australia back in the 70s. 17 built in the UK and 54 built in Australia. Our bus service, ACTION, had three covered bus depots for overnight parking but these buses could only park in one because the air-con unit was too high for two depots.
Interesting info about the Nationals in Canberra! Thanks for watching!
@@JeffreyOrnstein Here is a link to the ACTION operating manual for the Leyland Nationals: www.archives.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/562595/Leyland_bus_manual.pdf
I grew up with the East Yorkshire Bridgemasters from dark blue to NBC poppy red. EYMS was our local bus company. I never liked them, preferring the Atlanteans.
Interesting to hear about your experience with the Bridgemasters! Thank you for watching!
@JeffreyOrnstein as a kid we used to ask the drivers if we could have the AEC badge on the grille. Most laughed but one actually tried to prize if off for me. I wasn't lucky though, it was stuck fast.
First I enjoy being able to put a face to the voice, secondly what is the story on the radiator less cooling system?!?
Thank you for your nice comment! Not totally sure about the cooling system...just another newfangled thing that didn't really work! Thank you for watching!
AEC later had the Renown, which was slightly more successful and looked quite a bit better. They are worth a look too!
Thanks for the suggestion! I'll look into the Renown. Thank you for watching!
Sounds like two stroke diesel.
Yes, I think it is! Thanks for watching!
Thanks
Hello! Thank you so much! I very much appreciate the Super Thanks! And thank you for watching my video, I'm very glad you liked it!
I enjoyed this thanks. I rode on a lot of these, always good.
I'm really glad you enjoyed my Leyland National video! Thank you for watching!!